World News

European diplomats believe Joe Biden will repair the damage done by Trump to America's broken alliance with Europe

  • European diplomats and foreign policy experts say that a Joe Biden presidency would restore the United States' strained alliances with Europe.
  • Donald Trump's presidency has put relations between the US and its closest allies under severe stress.
  • The president's attacks on international institutions and his dislike for multilateral action have tested longstanding alliances.
  • One senior UK diplomat told Business Insider that they believed a Biden presidency would bring an end to "the venal corruption" of the Trump era.
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Joe Biden's election as US president in November would restore UK-US relations, repair the diplomatic damage caused by the Trump administration, and boost the prospects of a transatlantic trade deal, according to European diplomats and trade experts.

The transatlantic alliance between the US and its European allies has been under growing strain since Trump's election in 2016.

The president's attacks on multilateral institutions such NATO, his attacks on Europe's rapprochement with Iran, and his decision to pull out of the Paris climate accord have all tested the long-standing "special relationship" with the UK and other European allies.

The damage has been reflected among the European public, with recent polling showing a collapse in perceptions of America on the other side of the Atlantic.

However, there is growing optimism in European diplomatic circles that much of the damage could be undone were the president to lose in this year's election.

One senior UK diplomat, who asked not to be named, told Business Insider that a Biden presidency would bring a welcome end to the "venal corruption" of the Trump era.

"A lot of stuff will change if Biden wins," the diplomat said.

"The venal corruption of the Trump family and the nasty narcissistic aspects of his behaviour — all that will go with a different sort of president," they said.

"Rather than having a unilateralist America alone policy with a Biden, you would have a 'let's work with our allies to find solutions' approach."

The diplomat's comments echo those made by Biden's foreign policy adviser Antony Blinken, who signaled earlier this year that the US under Biden would rebuild the US's links with multilateral institutions.

"When Joe Biden looks at the world, one thing stands out," he told the London think-tank Chatham House, in comments reported by the Guardian. "Whether we like it not, the world tends not to organise itself and, for 75 plus years, the US played the leading role in working to organise the world, establishing the institutions, writing the rules and setting the norms."

"If we are not doing that, then one of two things happen. Either someone else is, and probably not in a way that advances our interest and values, or no one is, and that can be even worse. Then you have a vacuum which tends to be filled by malevolent things before good things. So the US has a responsibility and self-interest in leading with humility."

The distancing between Washington and its allies has been particularly keenly felt in the UK where relations with Washington have been severely tested by Britain's decision to sign off a deal with Chinese telecoms company Huawei to develop its 5G network, despite repeated opposition and threats from the Trumps administration.

Officials in the US were also angered in June by plans for Huawei to build a £400 million research & development centre in Cambridge, England.

That is not to say Biden would adopt a conciliatory approach towards China. In fact, he has signalled that he will take a similarly tough line on China to Trump, and has even criticised Donald Trump for being too soft towards Beijing.

"Democrats are as stern on this issue as Republicans," said Heather Conley, senior vice president for Europe, Eurasia and the Arctic at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

"The tactics will be very different. I would assume a Biden administration will not instigate tariffs and a trade war against their allies.

"They will try to convince them [instead] to reduce dependence on Chinese investment, particularly in telecommunications. But the message will still be the same."

"That's where I think the R&D centre is going to be a significant concern to a Biden administration as much as it would be to a Trump administration," Conley said.

One UK diplomat told Business Insider: "[Issues] like taking a firm line with China, like Iran — those things will remain bones of contention. These [Biden and his allies] are people who believe in alliances, in the difference between right and wrong, and in the moral standing of the United States as the leader of the free world. But they accept it has to be earned."

Biden's hostile rhetoric towards China indicates the state of UK-US relations could well end up being governed by how Boris Johnson chooses to manage the UK's relationship with Beijing.

The prime minister has not formally signalled that he will pull the UK out of the deal to let Huawei build part of the UK's 5G network but he indicated this week that he was going to think "very carefully" about whether to proceed with the deal because he "didn't want to see our critical national infrastructure at risk of being in any way controlled by potentially hostile state vendors."

Conservative MPs and Downing Street are increasingly worried about the UK's dependence on China for investment and imports.

Those concerns have only grown due to the coronavirus pandemic, which highlighted the UK's dependence on China.

A UK-US trade deal will remain challenging

Joe Biden and former UK Prime Minister David CameronGettyConley also suggested the UK's decision may have been driven in part by an assessment on the UK's part that the US Congress would not approve a free-trade agreement if the Huawei decision did go ahead.

"What I've seen over the last several weeks is a significant shift in the UK's position — whether that's in part because of the realities of a UK-US free trade agreement, and knowing that Congress would not approve an FTA unless the Huawei issue was addressed, or whether there was now so much pressure coming from intelligence channels and others that the government made a decision that it had to move off its position," she said.

There is also muted optimism among some trade experts that a Biden administration could bolster the prospects of a UK-US free trade deal, on which progress has stalled in recent months.

While the impact of such a trade deal would be economically negligible — boosting the economy by only 0.16% over 15 years — Downing Street believes it would represent a significant political win and mark a new era of post-Brexit global trade.

Currently, obstacles to a deal include US demands that the UK drop its opposition to importing US agricultural products, as well as the UK's plans to introduce a digital services tax, which could mean big US tech companies face much higher taxes.

But Gary Hufbauer, a senior fellow at the Washington-based Peterson Institute for International Economics, told Business Insider that a Biden administration would be more likely to be willing to compromise on several sticking points in negotiations.

"I think a Biden administration would be more willing to live and let live," Hufbauer told Business Insider.

"The Biden insistence on [food safety standards] would be not nearly so insistent as with the Trump administration. So that would make things easier in a deal with the UK," he said.

Additionally, he said, a Biden administration would also appear more inclined to seek a compromise on the digital services tax, possibly in the form of agreed international cap on the amount of revenue it could raise.

However, James Kane, a trade associate at the UK's Institute for Government think tank, said that a Biden administration would be unlikely to drop its current demands on agriculture.

"On trade policy, the US is heavily driven by domestic business interests — and this is particularly true of agriculture," he told Business Insider.

"The US objective will remain to get US agricultural products into the UK. That will still mean removing tariffs and non-tariff barriers like the ban on hormone-treated beef and chlorinated chicken.

"The US tried to do that with the European Union under Obama, and I don't see why they'd do it any differently under President Biden."

"An awful lot of US trade policy is bi-partisan. It has always been America First. Trump has just been the first to put it in such crude terms."

Source: Read Full Article

World News

Varney: It's time for Joe Biden to face real questions

Varney: What does Biden think about trashing statues?

FOX Business’ Stuart Varney wonders what presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden thinks of tearing down statues, the defacing federal property, the Democratic National Committee attacking President Trump over his planned trip to Mount Rushmore or Seattle’s CHOP.

President Trump is set to attend a fireworks display for a Fourth of July celebration at Mount Rushmore, the iconic monument that honors George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln.

Continue Reading Below

But the planned visit drew some ire from the Democratic National Committee, which tweeted that his visit is "glorifying white supremacy."

While the tweet was later taken down, FOX Business' Stuart Varney noted the Democrats' first thought was to "somehow slime the president" during his recent "My Take."

"So we've come to this: Virtually any statue from the past can be attacked, vandalized and torn down, and that includes George Washington," Varney said.


New York Times columnist Charles M. Blow wrote in a Sunday op-ed that "Yes, even George Washington" statues must be taken down due to the ongoing debate over existing monuments.

"On the issue of American slavery, I am an absolutist: enslavers were amoral monsters," Blow wrote. "The very idea that one group of people believed that they had the right to own another human being is abhorrent and depraved. The fact that their control was enforced by violence was barbaric."


Blow argued slaveowners "used anti-black dehumanization to justify the holding of slaves and the profiting from slave labor."

The New York Times columnist explained Washington owned more than 100 slaves and noted Washington's support of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1793 which allowed slave owners to capture runaways in any state and criminalized helping slaves to escape. The Thirteenth Amendment later nullified the law.

Varney worries "trashing the Founding Fathers" a slippery slope.


"When only the far left's opinion on race, culture and history is the only opinion that's allowed, you know the country has a problem," Varney said.

While this debate is raging, presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden has remained somewhat silent, Varney noted.

"He told Politico that he supports a commission to decide on renaming military bases but that's about it," Varney said. "He hasn't held a press conference in months."


Varney believes Americans aren't happy to see the country's history "canceled and spray painted."

"Don't tell me we are prepared to see a presidential candidate ignore what members of his own party are doing," Varney said.

Varney said Biden is also not weighing in on the defund the police movement and the death of a 16-year-old who was shot in Seattle's CHOP zone.

"So far, silence has been golden," Varney said. "He's gone up in the polls without saying a word. It's time he faced real questions, and then we'll all be able to make an informed decision in November."

Fox News' Joseph A. Wulfsohn contributed to this report.


Source: Read Full Article


Barack Obama’s First Fundraiser For Joe Biden Reaps $7.6 Million For Campaign

Former president Barack Obama headlined his first fundraiser for Joe Biden on Tuesday, at an event that raised $7.6 million for his former vice president’s campaign.

That is the most money raised for at any Biden event this cycle.

With 175,000 donors chipping in, Obama and Biden appeared virtually before thousands of donors,

Obama criticized his successor, but it was a contrast to the theatrics and wild accusations that Donald Trump has used against him.

“As challenging as those times were and as much of a slog as it was to yank the economy out of the economic crisis that it was in and in some ways things were tougher in terms of the financial system than they are today, but there was still a sense of a shared American idea that we could build on,” Obama said. “And what we have seen over the last couple of years is a White House enabled by Republicans in Congress and a media structure that supports them that has not just differed in terms of policy but has gone at the very foundations of who we are and who we should be.

He then added a set of phrases about the the Trump administration, saying it is one “that suggests facts don’t matter, science doesn’t matter. That suggests that a deadly disease is fake news. That sees the Justice Department as simply an extension and arm of the personal concerns of the president. That actively promotes division. And considers some people in this country more real as Americans than others. That we haven’t seen out of the White House in a very long time.

Obama, though, said that there is a “great awakening” going on in the country, “particularly among younger people.”

“Not only are they fed up with the shambolic disorganized mean spirited approach to governance that we’ve seen over the last couple of years, but more than that are eager to take on some of the core challenges that have been facing this country for centuries,” Obama said.



Source: Read Full Article